How Is Baby in Clay County Fl With Explosion

You know about how individuals proceeds command of the power of the Country then abuse that power like onetime U.s.a. President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some The states businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons plan which was a serious world security threat when Republic of iraq did non and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley fifteen Feb 2011.

Remember how Bush-league was supported by Britain Premier Tony Blair who helped past persuading the British Parliament to join the Us with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'south weapons of mass destruction which did not exist just which Blair claimed could be deployed inside xl minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If you remember that and so yous will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade us nosotros are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they can salve us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this mean solar day.

On CHS we wrote previously about how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came virtually as a result of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The issue cannot exist owing to the smallpox vaccine – whatsoever vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to accept:

Small Pox – Big Prevarication – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty disease chosen smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was especially the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for convenance and spreading disease: London's first park congenital after rich feared disease spread from slums United kingdom The Independent Past Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the Country would keep them safe from the threat of illness.  The bulk of the population of unabridged countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "groovy unwashed" masses would exist vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the disease: Smallpox Bloodshed, UK, U.s.a., Sweden.

At present you lot tin read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Physician – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Mortality- Britain, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs beneath notice the big numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the Britain, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the affliction dimished with improved living standards and was non vanquished by vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells u.s.. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "work" did non.  On any scientific analysis of the history and information, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the Urban center of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table below].  Leicester's approach as well cost far less.

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Unabridged Book equally .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Table 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Period.	Small-scale-Pox.  Cases	Small-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Nihon	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Ground forces (United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.one
British Army (India)	1860-1908	ii,753	307	11.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.eight
Majestic Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
Chiliad Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.three
Leicester (since giving up vaccination)	1880-1908	1,206	61	5.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I take given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, then that they may be compared either fashion with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive pocket-sized-pox fatality of Nippon, of the British Army, and of the Imperial Navy, are non due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical report were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a respective outcome—just on the opposite side."

TABLE 29.

Pocket-size-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Small-Pox Cases	Modest-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Price of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	16.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	xi.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	vii,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	4.ten	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ past Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Md

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to apply the flu vaccine, y'all might be wondering where the idea of vaccination got its offset. Where did the thought of injecting whole or $.25 of microbes and other substances into people in an try to provide protection confronting contagious affliction begin?

Many medical and history books present a uncomplicated tale of the origin of vaccination. Most present the same basic tale of the brilliant ascertainment of a elementary land doctor and his backbone in attempting to thwart a mortiferous and frightening affliction of that fourth dimension – smallpox, or as it was oft chosen the speckled monster. In a recent and pop book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an viii-year old boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes's cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps's hands. The boy came downward with a slight fever, only zilch more. Later, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a total-blown, albeit mild, case of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox again; again, zero. [one]

Edward Jenner'south idea eventually became known every bit vaccination, which is derived from the Latin give-and-take for cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, merely eventually the term vaccination was adopted. Equally the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would be tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not dissimilar the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the mortiferous snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner fable has been reduced to a unproblematic and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in identify, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to support a belief, achieve an iconic status while whatever unsavory aspects about the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the artillery of healthy people. This thought was introduced to the Western world past Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practice of inoculation confronting smallpox, known as variolation. This blazon of inoculation was simply a affair of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The thought backside inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would practise better against the illness than if they contracted information technology at some possibly less desirable time and place in the future.

The thought was embraced by the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. But because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could only be afforded by the wealthy.[iii] The procedure did often help protect the private that was inoculated, but there was even so an estimated 2-5% that died as a result.[four,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] But, was the divergence in mortality due to inoculation solitary? Or could it accept had something to exercise with the fact that the wealthy had meliorate access to more nutritious food and a cleaner surround than the majority of guild?

There was one major and mostly unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would accept been naturally. In a 1764 commodity the writer recognized that smallpox was a contagious affliction and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years earlier the introduction of variolation to the 38 years after, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯non decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse problems, considering information technology caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends information technology; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where information technology would not otherwise take been produced; the place where information technology is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a middle where the disease should happen in a natural manner; these centers of contagion are patently multiplied very greatly past Inoculation . . .[7]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of information technology spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had go a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically connected by most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox continued to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-year-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the child to smallpox as a test to come across if he was protected by the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did non contract clinical smallpox, information technology was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results challenge lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with simply rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Lodge, Jenner was ridiculed over his do.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at information technology. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [8]

From the first at that place were problems with Jenner'south procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox affair obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were and then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to encounter if the cowpox procedure had been constructive. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect any of them. Jenner received the report but decided to ignore the results because they were non in support of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced past many in the medical profession as the reply to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the procedure would produce lifelong protection. The medical community connected to embrace Jenner's ideas amid numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that there were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were yet dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the finish of the twelvemonth 1799. A month afterwards information technology was inoculated with pocket-size-pox matter without effect, and a few months later on took confluent pocket-size-pox and died. ii. A woman-servant to Mr. Take a chance, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had moo-cow-pox in the casual style from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught small-pox, and died. 3 and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, iii years of historic period, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . thirteen. The child of Mr. R died of small-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were bodacious of its security. The vaccinator'due south name was concealed. xiv. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'due south office . . . died of small-pox a twelvemonth after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early on 1800s began to accrue showing vaccination was not living up to its hope to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an 18% fatality rate and is substantially the same fatality rate as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This high fatality charge per unit forth with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another commodity in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering nether Pocket-sized Pox, who take previously undergone Vaccination past the nearly expert practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with 30 years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no 1 in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." Merely after vaccinating one,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people still could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practice.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the fourth dimension were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to embrace it as a new course of income. It is therefore quite significant for a doctor to have spoken out against information technology as Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could nevertheless infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also be infected.

. . . during the years 1820, 1, and, 2 [1820-1822] there was a neat hubbub nearly the small-pox. Information technology broke out with the neat epidemic to the n . . . It pressed shut to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had pocket-size-pox earlier, and often severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, but savage upon dandy numbers.[14]

William Cobbett was a farmer, journalist, and English language pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practise. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed past JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the real small-pox afterwards, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![fifteen]

During this time vaccine cloth was the "humanized" form, which meant that textile was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the adjacent person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, but equally failures increased there was a belief that the vaccine had lost its original supposed authorization, and there were calls to obtain fresh material straight from cows.[sixteen]

While the fable maintained that the vaccine material came from cows, Jenner really believed the textile originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, in that location were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[18] This faulty conventionalities would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a man who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow'due south udder. He then took pus from that cow and used information technology to vaccinate people. A big smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later inquiry adamant that this was aught more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but there were too reports of deaths from other causes before long after vaccination. For case, a skin condition called erysipelas was a particularly prolonged and painful way to dice.

. . . a boy from Somers-boondocks, aged 5 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, anile 22 years, "small-scale-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two skilful cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a carbohydrate baker, anile 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas afterward vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was existence used, other diseases could exist spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the University at Paris.

Offset I rejected the idea that syphilis could exist transplanted by vaccination. Just facts accumulated more and more, and at present I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by ways of the vaccine. I exercise this very reluctantly. At nowadays I do not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As information technology became increasingly articulate throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In society to deal with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nothing to adjourn the trouble of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, in that location were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the cracking 1872 epidemic. Afterwards 1855, there were farther smallpox epidemics in 1859-lx, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no effect at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the twenty years subsequently the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the xx years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox bloodshed rate from 1841 to 1880.

Past this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, there were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being fabricated by vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the force of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they will get most a quarter million. Other sums, too, which I cannot name, take been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a dishonest remedy produced so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did not vaccinate their children. However, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A not bad pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, fifty-fifty those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian state of war at that place were 20-three grand four hundred and sixty-nine cases of modest-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July xv, 1871 said:

Of ix g three hundred and ninety-2 pocket-size-pox patients in London hospitals, six thousand viii hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than than one hundred and twenty-two thousand vaccinated persons take suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Frg show that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine condom, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine movement. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the slap-up demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester'southward government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail fourth dimension, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to x%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and constructive means that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, there were dire predictions from the majority of the medical community that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination charge per unit would result in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the town'due south residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was not necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall subtract in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The feel of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an heart-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Hither is a smashing manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a meg, which has demonstrated by a crucial exam of an experience extending over a period of more a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to pocket-size-pox and far less afflicted by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a fourth dimension when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its developed population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was frequently promoted as a safe procedure, it often caused sickness or even expiry. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than 1,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph 4).

Graph 2: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales total deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph iv: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. After the summer of 1897, the astringent type of smallpox with its high expiry rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United states. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to one that only killed anywhere from one in l and later on to as low as i in 380. The affliction could still kill, just having get so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or skin eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the country. The bloodshed was very low and it [smallpox] was usually at kickoff mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox expiry rate was around 20%, as information technology had been historically. The table also showed that subsequently 1896 the death rate fell off rapidly, starting with 6% in 1897 to as low as 0.26% by 1908. As the mild form of smallpox replaced the classic blazon, smallpox could be hard to tell from chickenpox, which was, past this time, considered a mild affliction of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a pocket-sized communicable disease of childhood, and is chiefly important because information technology oftentimes gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced little in the way of symptoms, fifty-fifty though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or fifty-fifty epidemics, occur in which, although in that location has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the disease is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent-minded, and the ramble symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage charge per unit, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was not a major effect, the practice of smallpox vaccination connected from the time of the last smallpox expiry in the United States in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated five,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a peel condition due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated by the authors to exist between 1 in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of four to twoscore%.[35] However, they acknowledged that most cases were non reported and there was no accurate accounting on this result of vaccination. There were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths as the upshot of smallpox vaccination, while during the aforementioned fourth dimension at that place had only been 1 smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the United States post-obit an importation occurred in 1948, but since that fourth dimension there take been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military father after the male parent was vaccinated. Afterward a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother besides required treatment and virus was institute all over the business firm.[38]

Considering of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 written report thought that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually take been even higher. This study only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a country with a modernistic health-care system, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the entire world?

There were those in the medical customs who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. We are ashamed to jettison the idea completely and peradventure afraid that if nosotros did the blow of some future epidemic might put the states in the wrong. We prefer to permit compulsory vaccination dice a natural death and are relieved that the general public is non curious enough to need an inquest. In the meantime our attending is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination every bit near the only medically promoted fashion to deal with disease, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food production that is fabricated through fermentation of a variety of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, K.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the utilize of Acerb acid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as applied to pocket-size pox. Dr. Roth first claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable as a prophylactic in small-pox than Belladonna in carmine fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed ii tabular array-spoonfuls of vinegar, after breakfast and at evening, for 14 days. Few persons thus treated took the illness at all. None who adopted the prophylactic handling died, while among those nether ordinary treatment the bloodshed was every bit usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe as well demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective confronting smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Once again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a existent preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should exist used three or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretarial assistant of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the swell men who for a century by have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, at present comes to the front end in the newspapers with the existent preventative. "Whatever person who has been exposed need accept no fearfulness of smallpox if he volition take two or iii tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar three or four times a 24-hour interval." The discussion may at present be regarded as closed, and smallpox at last is conquered![42]

Apple tree cider vinegar might seem lightheaded, but only because almost people take been conditioned to accept the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected brute's (usually a moo-cow) abdomen, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the man arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or merely an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the germination of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in pare, bones, and blood vessels and also gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve every bit mortar property cells together and, as a result, literally comes unglued and falls autonomously.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King'southward Higher, described the poor diet of gold miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, coffee, and booze while working long, hard days under the unrelenting California sunday. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gilded miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried salary or fatty pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fat, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, nether a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men beingness at the aforementioned time subjected to the near intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated ten,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice as many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in boxing.[44] For instance, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers cached at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly deemed for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the side by side common cause of expiry, with the infamous diseases such every bit smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for but a small fraction. Those who were killed in bodily boxing or who died every bit a consequence of their wounds deemed only for 1 pct of the total deaths.

Other large infectious killers such as cherry-red fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (as well known as pertussis) all profoundly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild babyhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive decline of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred earlier vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & six).

Graph v: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph six: England and Wales measles mortality charge per unit from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a country doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the destruction of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. But the true history shows the states a unlike reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche every bit something to protect someone from an disease. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the same notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is nothing close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple tree cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner'south great discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the curtain has been pulled dorsum on the origins of vaccination, do more than and more vaccines seem like a good idea to yous?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping cough, and lost remedies can be constitute in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk'southward book "Dissolving Illusions" which can be found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
one.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
ii.Scientific discipline the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
3.Victor C. Vaughan, Md, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
four.Frederick F. Cartwright, Illness and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
v.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present Land of the British Settlements of North-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
6.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Printing, 2007, p.179.
7."The Exercise of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman'southward Mag and Historical Relate, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
8.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Example Confronting Vaccination, Goddard'due south Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
x.William Scott Tebb, Doctor, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination by Deed of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. Viii, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
thirteen.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Advice to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in French republic," The Lancet, vol. 2, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and periodical of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Communication and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical periodical, vol. iv, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, Doc, "Partial Report on the Product of Vaccine Virus in the U.s.a.," Transactions of the American Medical Clan, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
xx.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Forenoon Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Study of Legislation Regarding Public Wellness in the Land of New York and Massachusetts," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. 4, February 1909, p. fifty-51.
24."Small-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. 19, no. iv, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.1000. W. Harman, Md, "A Physician's Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Journal of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. i, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June ane, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Demonstration Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April sixteen, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. Westward. Hodge, MD, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. xv.
31.J. Westward. Hodge, MD, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. Three, no. 16, Jan, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles Five. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Disease as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United states," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Manufactory Lancaster, An introduction to the exercise of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Toll Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Book 1, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, Baronial 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Press, p.21.
37.The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. x.
38.Maggie Play a trick on, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, January ane, 1938, pp. 48-49.
twoscore."Acetic Acrid in Crimson Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Journal of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. i, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Foreclose Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Journal of Medicine, vol. Half dozen, no. ane, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Wellness. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King'south Higher," Medical Times, vol. 23, Jan four to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Do good to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Written report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Wellness Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Rubber, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, authorities, Wellness, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, scientific discipline, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines |

How Is Baby in Clay County Fl With Explosion

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share :